Carbon Footprint

  • Home » Carbon Footprint

SEISMIC vs. Conventional Compaction

SEISMIC

  • Reduction of the number of compaction passes up to 30%
  • Additional savings in fuel consumption by 35% in combinations with ECO-mode
SEISMIC
Fuel Consumption8,45[l/h}
Utilization per Year1 500{h]
Fuel per Year and
machine		19 500[l]
Carbon / diesel liter0,720[kg]
Oxgen required to combust / liter diesel1,92[kg]
CO² per liter diesel2,64[kg]
30 % reduction of
number of passes		0,70
CO2 per Year23 423[kg]

Coventional

  • Non-SEISMIC-machine
NON-SEISMIC
Fuel consumption13,00[l/h]
Utilization per year1 500[h]
Fuel per year and machine19 500[l]
Carbon / diesel liter0,720[kg]
Oxygen required to combust / liter diesel1,92[kg]
CO² per liter diesel2,64[kg]
CO² per Year51 480[kg]

Why Dynapac SEISMIC?

Our Clients Says

Dynapac customer testimonials convinced by SEISMIC

img

They have supported us a lot after the purchase of the roller and we are happy with its performance! We hope to only have to see them once we buy the next machine, althoug if we need them, they will surely be here.

Jose Antonio Aparcio Owner of a SEISMIC roller
img

The cabin is very comfortable, it is very well soundproofed.
And this is appreciated for the long and hard working hours.

César B. Pardo Roller Operator
img

Delighted to collaborate with Transapaval and Canteras Blocona,
we hope that these rollers are the beginning of a long successful relationship.

Carlos Jimenez Del Olmo Account Manager

Stay in touch with us

Drop us an mail

info@dynapac.com